Are you Doing Control Testing in your Organisation?

Regulators, boards, auditors, and other stakeholders all have an increased focus on controls (and their effectiveness) so how can you demonstrate that your key controls are operating as intended?  

So many organisations are guilty of having controls on their risk register but not doing much else with them aside from waiting on the risk to crystalise or for an incident to happen that will flag the ineffective controls. Taking this approach, how can you be sure that your controls are working as intended? 

What is a Control? 

There are a range of descriptions out there but for now let us focus on the ISO 31000 definition, that a control is a measure that is modifying risk. 

Many organisations choose to categorise their controls, and below are just a few of the examples that we have seen: 

  • Preventative Controls – These controls are designed to prevent undesirable events from occurring. Examples include Segregation of Duties and Systems Access Rights. 
  • Detective Controls – These controls are designed to identify issues / errors that have already occurred. Examples include Reconciliation of Bank Accounts and System Access Log Reviews. 
  • Corrective Controls – These controls are designed to correct / resolve an issue that has already occurred. A good example of a corrective control would be Carrying out Key System / Data Backups. 

Control Testing 

Organisations take different approaches to the actual testing of their controls; our opinion is that it is best to break the process up into two separate ‘tests’. 

The first test is to check for Design Effectiveness (DE). The purpose of the DE test is to ensure that the control is appropriately designed to mitigate the intended risk(s). If the control is deemed as “Effective” following the DE test, the control owner should then move onto the Operating Effectiveness (OE) test. 

The OE test involves checking if the control is operating as designed. From our experience, many controls that pass the DE test go on to fail the OE test. 

In the following example, we have assumed that all testing is carried out by the Control Owner and that an independent review is conducted by the risk management function. The process may differ from organisation to organisation. 

 

Design Effectiveness Testing 

As explained above, the purpose of the DE test is to ensure that the control is appropriately designed to mitigate the intended risk(s). For organisations starting out on their control testing journey, we suggest using a simple, consistent questionnaire for each control. Here are some examples of the questions you could include in your DE test: 

  • Evidence – Is there a documented procedure (or other document) that outlines how this control should operate? 
  • Key Person – Do you have an adequate number of people trained in how to operate this control? 
  • Control Type – If all the steps in the control are followed, will the issue it was designed to address be prevented, detected, or corrected? 

It is ok for some of the questions to be “Not Applicable” for every single control. 

Once the DE questionnaire has been completed, the final step is for the Control Owner to rate the control as “Effective” or “Not Effective” (the terms you use will be determined by the scale / rating system adopted by your organisation).
There is no magic formula as to how many questions need to be answered “Yes” for the control to pass the DE test, this is something that each organisation will need to determine. 

If the control passes the DE test, move onto the Operating Effectiveness test. If the control has failed the DE test, there’s very little value in testing whether or not it is operating as intended, considering that you’ve just discovered that the control is not appropriately designed to mitigate the intended risk! 

Operating Effectiveness Testing 

As explained above, the OE test examines whether the control is actually operating as designed / intended and this is done by “sampling” the control. 

Sampling involves the Control Owner looking for examples of where the control has been operated and then testing / checking if it operated as intended. Essentially, the Control Owner is checking whether the control is operating as outlined in the DE Test results. 

“How big should my sample be?” 

You could link the required sample size back to the control frequency. For example, if the control operates daily / continuously, you may require the control owner to obtain twenty samples of the control from the last quarter. Whereas, if the control operates monthly, you might decide that three samples over the last twelve months is enough. Again, this will differ from organisation to organisation, and depend on the length of time you want to commit to control testing. 

Conclusion 

Control testing is very often missing from risk management programmes, mainly because it can be viewed as very time-consuming. We feel that by following the approach outlined above, you will be able to semi-automate your control testing program and turn it into a business-as-usual activity. By doing this you will be demonstrating to your board, regulators, and other stakeholders the robustness of your risk management programme. 

____________________ 

Operating Effectiveness Control Test Template 

Click here to download our template for conducting operating effectiveness tests. 

If you are interested in learning more about how CalQRisk can help with Control Registers, Control Testing and more, click here to contact us

Recent News

CalQRisk Shortlisted as Best Technology Partner in Housing Digital Innovation Awards

CalQRisk has been named a finalist in the Housing Digital Digital Innovation awards. CalQRisk is nominated as best ...
Read More

CalQRisk Achieves G-Cloud 14 Approved Supplier Status

Delighted to confirm that following on from our GCloud 13 supplier status, that CalQRisk has been listed as ...
Read More

CalQRisk named as Finalist for Cyber Security Provider of the Year at the Cyber Insurance Awards Europe

CalQRisk are thrilled to be finalists for the Cyber Security Solution Provider of the Year at the Cyber ...
Read More

Volunteer Succession Planning – ‘Tomorrow’ has arrived.

Strong succession planning is critical for the viability of all businesses but can be particularly challenging for volunteer-led ...
Read More

What is CSRD?

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is a framework for non-financial reporting which is mandatory for large companies ...
Read More

CalQRisk Triumphs at the 2024 FS Awards, Winning Compliance and RegTech Award

At a distinguished ceremony held at the iconic Mansion House, CalQRisk emerged as the proud recipient of the ...
Read More

NoFrixion Selects CalQRisk for its DORA Compliance Efforts

NoFrixion, the Embedded Banking company based in Dublin, Ireland, has announced its partnership with CalQRisk to ensure compliance ...
Read More

CalQRisk is a finalist in the FS Awards

CalQRisk has been named as a finalist in the competitive and prestigious FS Awards for the Compliance and ...
Read More

CalQRisk Customer Support Manager wins Rising Star at Irish Early Career Awards 2024

Congratulations to our Customer Support Manager, Eimear Farrell, who was named as a Rising Star in the Fintech ...
Read More

CalQRisk wins Pitch Competition at ESCO Cyber Solution Days Event, Kilkenny, September 2024

The Cyber Ireland (CI) CISO Forum and ESCO Cyber Solution Days event took place in the Lyrath Hotel, ...
Read More